XXXXXX

155 results
1
2
3
4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#101 Ballroompirate

Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Here we go...
UnrealLegend

I could watch this all day...

12 years ago

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 freedomfreak Online

Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

.

12 years ago

todd2r_Partdeux

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 todd2r_Partdeux

Member since 2012 • 762 Posts

I knew this was gonna happen. I will tell ya guys a quick story just to prove my point. I walked into my local GameStop earlier and I was like "hey guys, you guys got the new Transformers game?". They replied, "yep... 360 only though, sorry". I said, "why is that? The ps3 version sold out already?". They started laughing. fuk no man. Another inferior multiplat confirmed. It's so shiity we can't even sell it. But then again, nobody wants this ps3 shiit anyways". True story.

12 years ago

13841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#105 HalcyonScarlet

Member since 2011 • 13841 Posts

I guess the reviewer wasn't a fan. It got a 8.5 on IGN and lots of praise in their review. Oh well, I guess fans will probably like it no matter what, it seems to cater to them.
immortality20

So does everything else. :P

12 years ago

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

People have really been going overboard with these lame .gifs today.

12 years ago

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2009 • 1979 Posts

I won't be getting the game regardless of plataform, but i was hoping for some good ol' damage control. This one's average. *sigh*

12 years ago

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Are things so bad for the SD twins that they have to fight of rubbish games like this lol?

Sad days indeed.

12 years ago

45749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 SecretPolice

Member since 2007 • 45749 Posts

Transformers: Fall of Teh PS3. :P

12 years ago

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2010 • 1069 Posts

Might try it out. After all, everyone else is applauding it.

Loves me some Transformers. :cool:

12 years ago

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

I feel like the score for both versions should be much lower with the glitches he mentioned even on 360. Won't be picking this up for PS3 or 360, the dev doesn't deserve my money if they can't take care of obvious problems.

12 years ago

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

Hang on... there must be some mistake. The PS3 getting an inferior multiplat? SHOCKING!!!

12 years ago

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

..bu..but.. teh Cell?!?!?

12 years ago

4890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4890 Posts

The cows:arrow:.
lol
TheGuardian03

That gif is great.

12 years ago

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 CanYouDiglt

Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts

I'll try it when the price goes down some. I mean the PC or 360 version of course not that crappy PS3 version of course.

12 years ago

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Do_My_Booty

Member since 2012 • 27 Posts

lol what do you expect from the ps3. 7 yrs into the gen and it still cant keep up.

12 years ago

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts

Anybody played the PC version yet?

12 years ago

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]Who cares? There are versions of games that score higher on the ps3 as well.

nah, not often. its hard to make games for an inferior system

Orly? Cause pretty sure Persona 4 PS3 outscored the 360 version by a whole point not so long ago. And obvious try hard troll is obvious.

awesome, some japanese game no one cares about. yay ps3 :roll:

12 years ago

1248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 OneInchMan99

Member since 2012 • 1248 Posts

Will be getting this for PS3 when the price drops,enjoyed the first.No other review has mentioned any problems for PS3 version.You guys really blow things out of proportion in your quest for fanboy domination.LOL

12 years ago

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#120 The_Game21x

Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]Who cares? There are versions of games that score higher on the ps3 as well._Cadbury_

nah, not often. its hard to make games for an inferior system

Orly? Cause pretty sure Persona 4 PS3 outscored the 360 version by a whole point not so long ago. And obvious try hard troll is obvious.

And, as has been reported, the technical issues that plagued the 360 version of Persona 4 Arena have already been fixed.

I doubt we'll be seeing a similar situation for this, however...

12 years ago

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 platniumgamer

Member since 2011 • 3960 Posts

[QUOTE="platniumgamer"]
[QUOTE="OB-47"]
The ps3 version got a lower score because ps3 has higher standerds then lamebox 360. ps3 gamers prefer mor emmersive games.
OB-47

ur grammar is bad but fakeboys do have bad grammar

yu just mad you dont have that sony swag.

man u just love embarrassing yourslef your grammar is horrible fakeboy

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#122 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

This is a low end score from Gamespot. I just dont think they like Transformers games, so all the intricacies are lost on them. Both games are solid 7.5-8.0 games with a lot of fun. A huge Transformers fan might rate them higher. For everyone else though, 7.5-8 is on target. These are definitely fun games worth picking up. My one beef is the multiplayer gets too repetitive too quick, so most wont get addicted to it all year like COD or BF3. There arent enough maps, and the maps they have are small. It took me about a month to get completely fed up with the first game's multiplayer. I saw basically the same from the Fall of Cybertron demo.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#123 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"][QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]
Meh I'll be judge of that...I don't trust reviewers or reviews at all.
tormentos

The review has footage of the frame rate and many issues the ps3 version is having.

And the good version score 7.0 which is were all the argument falls,if the game scored on 360 8.5 and 6.5 on PS3 for the fails then yeah is a deal breaker,but .5 with all the flaws the so call PS3 version has,just .5 more na both versions failed.

yeah obviously the "flaws" arent deal breakers. The Metacritic is sitting above 8, so 7.0 is not that good a score. Its certainly nothing to brag about over a 6.5.

12 years ago

38080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#124 cainetao11

Member since 2006 • 38080 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]Link Seems the PS3 version is riddled with technical flaws. Teh Cell fails to prevail once again.

7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...

My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's

12 years ago

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]Link Seems the PS3 version is riddled with technical flaws. Teh Cell fails to prevail once again.

7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...

My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's

Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Bad, in the real world 7 games are considered good and most definitly 2 points above average, Ps3 fanboys are ruining it for the rest of us,lol

12 years ago

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 nervmeister

Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Baddelta3074

You weren't around for the Infamous 2 and Starhawk review threads, were you. :roll:

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#127 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]Link Seems the PS3 version is riddled with technical flaws. Teh Cell fails to prevail once again.

7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...

My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's

I dont think thats the gamers fault. Its the critics and reviewers who first need to acknowledge risks in their scoring. They are the ones handing out 8.5+ scores to most of the big name franchises and publishers that keep putting out sequels every year or two. With that track record, how can you expect gamers to look at a 7.0 with any appreciation?

12 years ago

38080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#128 cainetao11

Member since 2006 • 38080 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Badnervmeister

You weren't around for the Infamous 2 and Starhawk review threads, were you. :roll:

I certainly was and Infamous 2 is a great, not good game, imo.

12 years ago

Stevo_the_gamer

50214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#129 Stevo_the_gamer Moderator

Member since 2004 • 50214 Posts

Not a big deal since it's a Transformers game. That Persona 4 ordeal was more notable.

12 years ago

38080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#130 cainetao11

Member since 2006 • 38080 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"][QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="tormentos"] 7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...

My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's

I dont think thats the gamers fault. Its the critics and reviewers who first need to acknowledge risks in their scoring. They are the ones handing out 8.5+ scores to most of the big name franchises and publishers that keep putting out sequels every year or two. With that track record, how can you expect gamers to look at a 7.0 with any appreciation?

Because I'd wager quite a few gamers only look at the number and decide if they want to play said game. I would have missed out on many great experiences if I hadnt actually READ the review.

12 years ago

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Badnervmeister

You weren't around for the Infamous 2 and Starhawk review threads, were you. :roll:

Those 2 games Flopped by system wars standards which means they didn't meet there hype, nobody said they where bad games just that they flopped, besides, it was mainly the cows complaining about the score for infamous 2 nobody else really.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#132 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="tormentos"] 7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...

My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's

Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Bad, in the real world 7 games are considered good and most definitly 2 points above average, Ps3 fanboys are ruining it for the rest of us,lol

Thats such a load of crap. When all the other big releases are getting 8.5's even with sorry single player campaign's like what BF3 had and other flaws, how do you expect gamers to appreciate 7.0 or below? I dont care if the frame rate stutters a bit more on PS3 or the loading time is slow. That's pretty standard stuff. Skyrim shipped with absurd game issues on PS3 rendering it unplayable for a lot of people, but still got a 9.0.

12 years ago

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 nervmeister

Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

nobody said they where bad gamesdelta3074

Nobody except every elite Sony hater on this board.

12 years ago

Stevo_the_gamer

50214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#134 Stevo_the_gamer Moderator

Member since 2004 • 50214 Posts

Nobody except every elite Sony hater on this board.nervmeister

Quit your crying, this isn't a big deal.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#135 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9'scainetao11

I dont think thats the gamers fault. Its the critics and reviewers who first need to acknowledge risks in their scoring. They are the ones handing out 8.5+ scores to most of the big name franchises and publishers that keep putting out sequels every year or two. With that track record, how can you expect gamers to look at a 7.0 with any appreciation?

Because I'd wager quite a few gamers only look at the number and decide if they want to play said game. I would have missed out on many great experiences if I hadnt actually READ the review.

I usually will pick it up if I play a demo and like the gameplay. Otherwise, I'm waiting until the price drops or I can give it a shot used at Gamestop. Why? Because ive played too many games that had serious flaws, yet still got an 8.5+. So then I look at a 7.0 and cant help but see a massive warning light telling me there is something seriously wrong here.

12 years ago

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]My god.........and people wonder why devs and publishers dont take risks anymore......when gamers believe 7/10 is a fail what do you expect them to do but rehash what got them 9's-ArchAngeL-777-

Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Bad, in the real world 7 games are considered good and most definitly 2 points above average, Ps3 fanboys are ruining it for the rest of us,lol

Thats such a load of crap. When all the other big releases are getting 8.5's even with sorry single player campaign's like what BF3 had and other flaws, how do you expect gamers to appreciate 7.0 or below? I dont care if the frame rate stutters a bit more on PS3 or the loading time is slow. That's pretty standard stuff. Skyrim shipped with absurd game issues on PS3 rendering it unplayable for a lot of people, but still got a 9.0.

i appreciate a lot of games that scored under a 7, too human and aliens vs predator for example and games like BF are scored on there multiplayer as well and with BF the multiplayer more than makes up for any shorcomings in the single player campaign and Skyrim was reviewed before the Memoery leak bug was discovered in the Ps3 version becauase it didn't appear until about 100 hours into the game, with a game as big as skyrim it takes a little time for most of the bugs to become apparent.

12 years ago

38080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#137 cainetao11

Member since 2006 • 38080 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"][QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"] I dont think thats the gamers fault. Its the critics and reviewers who first need to acknowledge risks in their scoring. They are the ones handing out 8.5+ scores to most of the big name franchises and publishers that keep putting out sequels every year or two. With that track record, how can you expect gamers to look at a 7.0 with any appreciation?

Because I'd wager quite a few gamers only look at the number and decide if they want to play said game. I would have missed out on many great experiences if I hadnt actually READ the review.

I usually will pick it up if I play a demo and like the gameplay. Otherwise, I'm waiting until the price drops or I can give it a shot used at Gamestop. Why? Because ive played too many games that had serious flaws, yet still got an 8.5+. So then I look at a 7.0 and cant help but see a massive warning light telling me there is something seriously wrong here.

Fair assessment, brother. I always wait for price drop on the king, COD and I did on BF3. Why? I dont believe they are worth my $60. But I read reviews instead of just scores because inside I can decide if a game is described to be a worth a chance, fun time. Scores are for those that take this SW non sense serious. And you know some really do. Recently I recieved a message on PSN from NevilleThe Game, which asked "why do SW people think you dont have a PS3"? I would wager, because I do slightly prefer my 360. Because more often than not Multis are better on it; multis have been my favorite games this gen; and I prefer the controller. But the PS3 is an effin great console. It is a shame what the once mighty Sony has done to themselves this gen. A too high price point, dropping what they made popular=BC, and making the system a chore for devs not funded by Sony to develop for. Poor planning. Sony really thought third party devs would bypass easier deving and money to go with PS3 first and foremost? Who was running that company? My retarded sister?

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#138 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

The big problem is, releases considered any good these days get an 8.5+. its not even close. Name the last hyped title or major IP that scored less than that. Think Halo 4 or NFS Most Wanted or Blops 2 or Forza Horizon is going to score less than that? Think anything Rockstar puts out is going to score lower than that? They could be total glitch fests like Skyrim or have absent minded single player with little or no campaign, and that will be cited as the reason they are 8.5 and not 9.0 or 9.0 instead of 9.5. A standard has been set too high. Yet you get a lesser hyped game, and all the sudden the same flaws will be why your a 7.0 instead of a 9.0. So now you have to decide if the review is off or does that game really have the kind of issues that would drop it so far below the set standard. For most gamers, that means they arent going to drop $60 on what is easily perceived as a big risk. I dont let review scores dictate my purchases, but if I see a score like that on a title I'm on the fence for, I have to play a demo to have any chance at buying it before a price drop.

12 years ago

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

I'll try it when the price goes down some. I mean the PC or 360 version of course not that crappy PS3 version of course.CanYouDiglt

oh yeah 0.5points in review is the difference between a crappy game and a great game :roll:

12 years ago

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 platniumgamer

Member since 2011 • 3960 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I'll try it when the price goes down some. I mean the PC or 360 version of course not that crappy PS3 version of course.aroxx_ab

oh yeah 0.5points in review is the difference between a crappy game and a great game :roll:

yep .5 points of butthurt

12 years ago

38080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#141 cainetao11

Member since 2006 • 38080 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]The big problem is, releases considered any good these days get an 8.5+. its not even close. Name the last hyped title or major IP that scored less than that. Think Halo 4 or NFS Most Wanted or Blops 2 or Forza Horizon is going to score less than that? Think anything Rockstar puts out is going to score lower than that? They could be total glitch fests like Skyrim or have absent minded single player with little or no campaign, and that will be cited as the reason they are 8.5 and not 9.0 or 9.0 instead of 9.5. A standard has been set too high. Yet you get a lesser hyped game, and all the sudden the same flaws will be why your a 7.0 instead of a 9.0. So now you have to decide if the review is off or does that game really have the kind of issues that would drop it so far below the set standard. For most gamers, that means they arent going to drop $60 on what is easily perceived as a big risk. I dont let review scores dictate my purchases, but if I see a score like that on a title I'm on the fence for, I have to play a demo to have any chance at buying it before a price drop.

I see your points so clearly, dude. Well said. but, again, it, for me comes down to a review and not just a score. In the review, I can see the points for and against, where as, in a score it's just "oh it's not a 9 so it must have some glaring problems". I dont believe so. Because some reviewers problems are minor to me.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#142 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"][QUOTE="delta3074"]Only ps3 fanboys call a 7 Bad, in the real world 7 games are considered good and most definitly 2 points above average, Ps3 fanboys are ruining it for the rest of us,loldelta3074

Thats such a load of crap. When all the other big releases are getting 8.5's even with sorry single player campaign's like what BF3 had and other flaws, how do you expect gamers to appreciate 7.0 or below? I dont care if the frame rate stutters a bit more on PS3 or the loading time is slow. That's pretty standard stuff. Skyrim shipped with absurd game issues on PS3 rendering it unplayable for a lot of people, but still got a 9.0.

i appreciate a lot of games that scored under a 7, too human and aliens vs predator for example and games like BF are scored on there multiplayer as well and with BF the multiplayer more than makes up for any shorcomings in the single player campaign and Skyrim was reviewed before the Memoery leak bug was discovered in the Ps3 version becauase it didn't appear until about 100 hours into the game, with a game as big as skyrim it takes a little time for most of the bugs to become apparent.

I appreciate them too, but so many games get 8.5 these days, I dont blame anyone that is wary of a 7.0 or below. Its certainly not a PS3 fanboy issue.

12 years ago

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#143 The_Game21x

Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]nobody said they where bad gamesnervmeister

Nobody except every elite Sony hater on this board.

And Sony fanboys do the same thing every time a 360 game flops. Get over it.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#144 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]The big problem is, releases considered any good these days get an 8.5+. its not even close. Name the last hyped title or major IP that scored less than that. Think Halo 4 or NFS Most Wanted or Blops 2 or Forza Horizon is going to score less than that? Think anything Rockstar puts out is going to score lower than that? They could be total glitch fests like Skyrim or have absent minded single player with little or no campaign, and that will be cited as the reason they are 8.5 and not 9.0 or 9.0 instead of 9.5. A standard has been set too high. Yet you get a lesser hyped game, and all the sudden the same flaws will be why your a 7.0 instead of a 9.0. So now you have to decide if the review is off or does that game really have the kind of issues that would drop it so far below the set standard. For most gamers, that means they arent going to drop $60 on what is easily perceived as a big risk. I dont let review scores dictate my purchases, but if I see a score like that on a title I'm on the fence for, I have to play a demo to have any chance at buying it before a price drop.

I see your points so clearly, dude. Well said. but, again, it, for me comes down to a review and not just a score. In the review, I can see the points for and against, where as, in a score it's just "oh it's not a 9 so it must have some glaring problems". I dont believe so. Because some reviewers problems are minor to me.

Yeah I agree. I was more making a general statement than directly replying to you. You definitely have to read and decide. Which is what I do a lot. I'm usually not swayed by what a review says unless I'm already wavering on the game. I have quite a large number of games that score below 8. Usually I have had my eye on them, and got to play a demo. For instance, Mirror's Edge, Motorstorm, Heavenly Sword, Tron Evolution, Ratchet and Clank TOD, etc.

12 years ago

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 nervmeister

Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]Nobody except every elite Sony hater on this board.Stevo_the_gamer

Quit your crying, this isn't a big deal.

I know. Just pointing out the hypocrisy.

12 years ago

-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#146 -ArchAngeL-777-

Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]Because I'd wager quite a few gamers only look at the number and decide if they want to play said game. I would have missed out on many great experiences if I hadnt actually READ the review.cainetao11

I usually will pick it up if I play a demo and like the gameplay. Otherwise, I'm waiting until the price drops or I can give it a shot used at Gamestop. Why? Because ive played too many games that had serious flaws, yet still got an 8.5+. So then I look at a 7.0 and cant help but see a massive warning light telling me there is something seriously wrong here.

Fair assessment, brother. I always wait for price drop on the king, COD and I did on BF3. Why? I dont believe they are worth my $60. But I read reviews instead of just scores because inside I can decide if a game is described to be a worth a chance, fun time. Scores are for those that take this SW non sense serious. And you know some really do. Recently I recieved a message on PSN from NevilleThe Game, which asked "why do SW people think you dont have a PS3"? I would wager, because I do slightly prefer my 360. Because more often than not Multis are better on it; multis have been my favorite games this gen; and I prefer the controller. But the PS3 is an effin great console. It is a shame what the once mighty Sony has done to themselves this gen. A too high price point, dropping what they made popular=BC, and making the system a chore for devs not funded by Sony to develop for. Poor planning. Sony really thought third party devs would bypass easier deving and money to go with PS3 first and foremost? Who was running that company? My retarded sister?

Ever since MW2, I have been waiting on a price drop for COD. I didnt on BF3 because of the Back to Karkand pack. Had they not wrapped that into the launch price, I would have waited on that game too. PS3 was overpriced which led to them dropping BC, but that was the cost of going to the Cell and using Blu Ray. I have played a lot of multipats on PS3. Bad Company, 1943, and Orange box are the only ones that had issues that bothered me. BC and 1943 had serious mic issues to the point they didnt work at all. Orange Box was a terrible port. Outside of that, you might see some framerate drops every now and then, but nothing close to deal breaking. For all I know, the same happens on the 360, and it still looks good overall to me. I just cant get used to the 360 controller either way. Im too used to dual shock.

12 years ago

todd2r_Partdeux

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 todd2r_Partdeux

Member since 2012 • 762 Posts

First Sleeping Dogs and now Transformers. 6-7 years or whatever into the ps3 and cows still getting inferior multiplats. Sad. Ps3-it only does inferior multiplats.

12 years ago

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

First Sleeping Dogs and now Transformers. 6-7 years or whatever into the ps3 and cows still getting inferior multiplats. Sad. Ps3-it only does inferior multiplats. todd2r_Partdeux

Sleeping Dogs scored the same across all 3 platforms. Even if the 360 has a couple more pixels, it didn't seek to be enough to lessen the experience of the PS3 version.

12 years ago

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 platniumgamer

Member since 2011 • 3960 Posts

[QUOTE="todd2r_Partdeux"]First Sleeping Dogs and now Transformers. 6-7 years or whatever into the ps3 and cows still getting inferior multiplats. Sad. Ps3-it only does inferior multiplats. BPoole96

Sleeping Dogs scored the same across all 3 platforms. Even if the 360 has a couple more pixels, it didn't seek to be enough to lessen the experience of the PS3 version.

dont pay attention to him he is a bad lem

12 years ago

todd2r_Partdeux

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 todd2r_Partdeux

Member since 2012 • 762 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="todd2r_Partdeux"]First Sleeping Dogs and now Transformers. 6-7 years or whatever into the ps3 and cows still getting inferior multiplats. Sad. Ps3-it only does inferior multiplats. platniumgamer

Sleeping Dogs scored the same across all 3 platforms. Even if the 360 has a couple more pixels, it didn't seek to be enough to lessen the experience of the PS3 version.

dont pay attention to him he is a bad lem

Not a lem. Cow destroyer.

12 years ago

155 results
1
2
3
4

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment